Need help? Contact us We've detected unusual activity from your computer network To continue, please click the box below to let us know you're not a robot. Why did this
Wow, this is really something, even for a company as awful as Facebook.
“Facebook users who opted into voice-to-text in Messenger had NO warning about human transcribers.”
Earlier this week, Facebook confirmed it ran a program that allowed contractors to listen in on and write down the contents of some Facebook Messenger users’ audio clips. Facebook said that only users who’d consented to have their audio messages transcribed were affected, which implies the users clicked a box somewhere that said they knew the content would listened to or read by third parties.
“But based on a look at the Messenger permissions pop-up dialogue box, they didn’t,” writesBloomberg’s Sarah Frier:
In the Messenger mobile app, as soon as someone sends a voice message, they get a prompt asking, “Turn on Voice to Text in this chat?” Above the “No” and “Yes” buttons, Facebook describes the option: “Display text of voice clips you send and receive. You can control whether text is visible to you for each chat.”
There is no mention of human involvement. Even in a separate information page in the app dedicated to understanding Voice to Text, Facebook explains that users can turn it off for each chat, and prompts people to use it more. “Voice to Text uses machine learning,” it says. “The more you use this feature, the more Voice to Text can help you.” There’s no explanation that machine learning doesn’t just involve software code.
Companies including Apple Inc., Amazon.com Inc. and Alphabet Inc.’s Google have been relying on humans to check and improve their artificial intelligence systems — they’re just not telling their users about it. That’s a critical lapse at a time when all of the companies — especially Facebook — are facing regulatory scrutiny for privacy lapses. The Irish Data Protection Commissioner, in charge of enforcing European Union privacy laws, said it was looking into Facebook’s transcription practices.
Shadow-banning is a process that dates back to at least the 1980s, with Citadel BBS’s “twit bit,” which would allow users to post replies to forums that they could see, but no one else could see.
The Wall Street Journal reports that Facebook will offer corporate news outlets “millions of dollars for the rights to put their content in a news section that the company hopes to launch later this year,” citing unnamed sources familiar with the lawbreaking social media company and information warfare platform.
Facebook has lost a procedural appeal related to a 2015 Illinois class-action lawsuit over the company’s use of facial recognition data, and now it could be on the hook for billions in damages.
Just in time for your songs of the summer playlist, we’ve got a roundup of headphones, speakers, and earbuds. The best part? They’re all 15% off the already discounted price. Just use the online code SAVE15SOUND to take the extra savings off the final listed cost. Owlee Scroll Wireless Bluetooth Speaker No matter how big […]
Your home is your castle, but that doesn’t mean it has to be cold and stony. The summer is almost over, and that means the Labor Day sales are nigh. Here are 10 essential home accessories you never knew you needed, and you can take 15% off the final price (including any stated discounts). Just […]
Need to expand your IT know-how? It doesn’t happen overnight – but there are courses out there that can get you there quickly. Big businesses need the security, storage, and flexibility that cloud computing can provide, and they need competent IT professionals that know their way around those systems. Here are three online training packages […]